“Trapping” for Great Lakes Smallmouth
July 26th, 2010We were given permission from Midwest Outdoors to share this article on fishing Little Bay de Noc by Ray Hansen. Enjoy!
“TRAPPING” FOR GREAT LAKES SMALLMOUTH
Wind, Waves, and Weedbeds Combine for Fast Action
By: Ray Hansen
The morning started slow. The massive waters of Little Bay de Noc on northern Lake Michigan lay as flat as the felt top of my pool table. Fish swirled on the surface as if to taunt us, but they would not respond to the lures we tried. An occasional pike came aboard and kept us casting, but clearly we had to do something different.
Life-long angling friend Duane Deno of Gladstone, Michigan and I stopped casting, sat down on the swivel seats of my boat, and started discussing options. Looking for a clue, I scanned the horizon using binoculars, and spotted a long line of seagulls southwest of our position.
CLUE TO THE FORAGE
“Maybe the ‘gulls know something we don’t” I speculated. “Let’s head over there to see what they’re up to.”
Motoring toward the spot – a mile or so distant – we found that the flock of seagulls was much larger than we first realized. They extended in a line hundreds of yards long, from the breaking edge of a shallow bay well out into deep water. They were not there just to bask in the warm sun.
As I approached the deep end of the line, birds started flying away. I cut the motor and began to drift while I watched my locator. At the same time, Duane glassed the ‘gulls closer to shore and tried to see what attracted them.
The answer was not long in coming. “Hey, Ray,” he said, “look at this,” pointing down toward the lake’s surface. A couple small, dead baitfish floated on the surface. We thought they were shad, but maybe they were small whitefish or alewife. What exact species they were did not matter. The birds were feeding on them, and that meant larger fish would do the same.
WHERE TO START
We had a limited choice of starting points once we got the clue from the dead baitfish. We could troll this deeper water. Another option was to motor around to try to find a school of shad then cast lures around the edges. The final choice was to motor over to the line where the shoreline shallows dropped off into deeper water to see if bass, pike, or walleyes were pushing the smaller fish shallower to try to catch them.
WIND AND WEEDS HOLD POSSIBILITY
I ran the boat toward shore, and received a boost of confidence when I saw the drop-off. It went from about five feet deep on top, falling fast into twenty-eight feet at the base. Better yet, a line of good, green weed growth extended along the breaking lip of the structure, and it grew to depths of fifteen feet. While I analyzed the situation a breeze came up from the southeast, blowing into the face of the weedline.
CAN WE MATCH THE FOOD SOURCE WITH LURES?
We used long, narrow minnow-imitating lures earlier in the morning, but the bait we needed to imitate in this situation was a shorter wide-bodied shape. Rummaging through my tackle bag, I pulled out a flat box filled with shad-shaped lures. The Lewis “Rat-L-Trap” baits I selected looked perfect for the job.
INSIDE OR OUTSIDE?
A controlled drift using the electric trolling motor for course corrections allowed Duane and I to move along on a path just less than one cast length from the weed edge. Starting with a standard sinking model Rat-L-Trap, we targeted the outside edge of the weeds and by varying the retrieve speed we could “follow” the weed tops down into deeper water. Almost immediately, we found active bass, landing and releasing several within ten minutes.
By chance, I happened to spot a bass swirl on the surface along the inside weed edge in much shallower water. I set up a second rod with a floating style Rat-L-Trap to work this part of the structure. Because the floating model dives to about four feet on a medium speed retrieve, I found that I could cast across the submerged weed tops and bring the lure back in on a path that would barely skim across the tops of the visible vegetation without fouling in the weeds. We quickly found that bass would respond to both the casts directed to the inside of the weed edge and to the outside as well.
One difference we noticed is that we caught more “bonus” pike on the outside weed edge. Maybe there were simply more pike on the deep side, or maybe they just responded best to the faster retrieves used with the sinking model lures.
THE BOTTOM LINE
The Great Lakes offer tremendous opportunities for smallmouth bass action with plenty of surprises in a typical day’s angling. The 2009 BassMasters fishing tournament held on Little Bay de Noc at Escanaba, Michigan conclusively proved that. In addition, since these lakes are so vast, many places receive little or no fishing pressure. The summer pattern I’ve detailed here will provide plenty of great angling thrills. During the day I based this article on we landed and released over a dozen bass. The six best weighed from three pounds to four pounds, eight ounces apiece. This kind of action can be found along hundreds of miles of Great Lakes coastline, and will add some fishing excitement to your summer trips.











